Thread: Re-Baptism
View Single Post
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 09:20 PM
PuritanCovenanter's Avatar
PuritanCovenanter PuritanCovenanter is offline.
Norseman Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 7,732
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 856
Thanked 812 Times in 502 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter View Post
One more thing. I have a good book by J. H. Thornwell I believe where he refutes RC Baptism as invalid. Thus he would say that rebaptism is essential also. Is he a heretic? Some presby's on this board agree with him. Some believe that RCC baptism is legit.
I agree with Thornwell. I recall a debate a while back in which someone tried to argue that baptism by a priest was valid, but baptism by a midwife was not. This is ridiculous, as they both work for a synagogue of Satan. The RCC is not part of the visible church, its baptism is no more valid than that of a man standing on a street corner throwing water over people in the name of the Trinity.

A converted RC who is baptized in a Protestant church is not being rebaptized, but baptized, as they have not received the sacrament in the first place.
So say you. And I would agree somewhat and even go farther than you and say that about those who were baptised as infants period. We are going to disagree. But the charge of heresy is a bit overboard in my estimation. It does call for repentance.
__________________

(Norseman Moderator)

R. Martin Snyder
1689er
Harmony Baptist Church (Member)
PuritanCovenanter MSN Blog
PuritanCovenanter's MySpace Page

"Our object should not be to have scripture on our side but to be on the side of scripture; and however dear any sentiment may have become by being long entertained, so soon as it is seen to be contrary to the Bible, we must be prepared to abandon it without hesitation."
William Symington

Click to get:Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?