Thread: Intinction
View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:53 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 5,171
Thanks: 1,987
Thanked 460 Times in 272 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post
I also doubt that Jesus and the apostles communed with little plastic cups containing thimble-sized amounts of wine (make that grape juice), and a tiny piece of bread, at best, a fake plastic wafer, at worst.
Very true. And the early church even had an entire meal, with each family bringing their own food. There are many different minor variants in the way the Lord's Supper has been taken over the centuries. I tend to agree with raekwon, this is a sprinkling/submersion type of debate...


It just amazes me that some will argue vehemently against one position which has "no scriptural warrant" while advancing in theory, or at least practicing, another position which, as far as anyone can tell, has as little to do with scriptural practice as the first one.
It seems to me, looking at all of the posts on this thread, that more 'scriptural warrant' has been given in support of two distinct acts. In fact, no 'scriptural warrant' has been presented at all in favor of intinction. Or did I miss something?
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to KMK For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (05-30-2008), Joshua (05-30-2008), Theoretical (05-30-2008)