Thread: Intinction
View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 11:08 AM
raekwon's Avatar
raekwon raekwon is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 659
Thanks: 106
Thanked 223 Times in 119 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by raekwon View Post
It seems to me that taking the bread and wine by intinction falls within the bounds of the Westminster Standards, the necessary elements being the words of institution, thanksgiving/prayer, bread, and wine.
The confessional position is eating bread and drinking wine. I would argue that intinction fails at both.
See, I just don't know that it fails at either. The only one I can actually see any legitimate contention with is whether or not you're "drinking" the wine, and whenever I see the word "drinking" defined, it's something like "to take liquid into the mouth and swallow". Even if that liquid's been absorbed by another substance, it still seems to fall under that definition. As far as "eating" goes, I think it's pretty obvious that the bread is being eaten.

Still, I understand and appreciate your conviction.
__________________
Rae W. | Elder @ Grace Central Presbyterian Church | Columbus, OH
Online presence: blog | twitter | facebook