I really dislike the apologetic approach that argues for a god.

I have sat through apologetic lectures that argue against atheism and use Flew as a prime example that theism is reasonable, but it only begs the question of why the Christian God.

If we argue for theism we cannot complain if people get to a theistic position and then decide which god is most reasonable for them to believe in. This is as bad as atheism.

__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England

"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."