View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 10:34 AM
Ivanhoe Ivanhoe is offline.
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,871
Thanks: 860
Thanked 769 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mshingler View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spainharvest View Post
3. If the Bride of Christ is consumated and completed at His coming, is there another resurrection for believers after the 1,000 year reign? If so where is this in Scripture?

This third point is the one that probably has had the most influence on me as far as moving away from dispensational premil. and, tentatively, amil. The only way I can see a millennium after Christ's coming is if the church is a temporary institution, as in dispensationalism, and there is a whole different class/group of redeemed who are actually not part of the church but are, as I used to refer to them, "millennial saints." I can't really reconcile that with the emphasis in the N.T. that the church is the true, spiritual people of God and the sum total of the redeemed, for whom Christ died.
Russell Moore wrote a book that incorporates both your concerns and the defense of a millennial reign. He just doesn't focus the millennial reign around the Jews.

The Patristics knew this as well. Ireneaeus and Justin Marty employed chiliasm, but not as a defense for Jewish theology.

__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College