View Single Post
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 09:11 AM
satz satz is offline now.
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,087
Thanks: 239
Thanked 162 Times in 106 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by satz View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post

How can a reprobate man, who is baptized on the basis of a false profession, who does not have faith in God, answer him with a good conscience in your understanding?
I would say that such a man cannot answer God with a good conscience. I apologize, but I am not sure what you are getting at.
Hence, what difference does it make if it is a child or a false professor in your view. It seems that you cannot administer the ordinance for anyone for fear that the person professing may not really be giving an answer with a "good conscience" by your own admission.
The original post concerned a child of at least 18 years of age and asked '...At what point do we require a profession of faith from the child and thus engage in credo-Baptism...'

I admit I was surprised to see some paedobaptists seem to say that an 18 year old could be baptized without having to make a profession of faith, which I believe is against this verse.

I do not believe you need to be 'sure' that a person is really giving an answer with a good conscience before you can baptize. In Acts baptisms happened very quickly after the receipient responded positively to preaching, which would leave no time to investigate the genuineness of a person's profession. However, there was a response to the preaching, and certianly for someone of the age of 18, a profession would at least be required before baptism could be administrated.
__________________
Mark
Independent baptist
Singapore