View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 04:34 PM
DTK's Avatar
DTK DTK is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 954
Thanks: 31
Thanked 148 Times in 59 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie View Post
In particular, are translations and paraphrases inspired and therefore infallible or do these terms refer only to the original manuscripts in the original languages?
My response is not so much intended to answer your question directly, but rather to help you think through this issue.

Consider: It is well known by students of the Bible that textual variations between the Hebrew text, the Septuagint (LXX), and copies of both existed in the days of our Lord’s flesh, yet the Lord Jesus and the New Testament writers themselves quote repeatedly from contemporary copies of both the extant Hebrew texts and translations of the Septuagint, never once calling into question the certainty, integrity, and adequacy of these copies to communicate infallibly the word of the true and living God.

DTK
__________________
Sola Scriptura est norma normans non normata
David T. King, pastor
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Elkton, Maryland
Augustine (354-430): Therefore what He [i.e., Christ] has deigned to speak to us, we ought to believe that He meant us to understand. But if we do not understand He, being asked, gives understanding, who gave His Word unasked. NPNF1: Vol. VII, Tractates on John, Tractate XXII, §1.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DTK For This Useful Post:
Calvin'scuz (05-27-2008), HaigLaw (05-25-2008), nicnap (05-25-2008)