View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008, 02:20 AM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Semper Fidelis Semper Fidelis is offline.
Dux Tyrranus
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,653
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 2,393
Thanked 5,905 Times in 2,404 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Very simply, I believe that all of those who were baptized on the day of Pentecost were professing believers, and v. 42 states that this same group celebrated the Lord's Supper together.
By the same reasoning, may we conclude there were no women and children in the Desert? I just don't see this Chris.

Why must the verse that speaks about the activity of those present that day preclude any notion that they actually went home and told others in their household?

In fact, by your reasoning, if a single woman was not present that day, she couldn't have become a believer by the report of her husband. Assume the man comes home and tells his wife (who wasn't there that day) the news of Christ's resurrection. Since you insist that only the population at Pentecost that day were those that continued steadfastly in the Apostle's doctrine and the breaking of the bread, then there were absolutely no wives at home that day who heard the report from their husbands and later became believers.

Is this your assertion?
__________________
Rich
PCA, Northern VA
Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
The Following User Says Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post:
Dena (05-22-2008)