View Single Post
  #95 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 01:49 AM
JohnOwen007's Avatar
JohnOwen007 JohnOwen007 is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth, Australia.
Posts: 632
Thanks: 78
Thanked 215 Times in 99 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyhyde View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnOwen007 View Post
The 3FU are mono-covenantal the WCF is explicitly bi-covenantal.
This perked my ears. I think of know what you are talking about, but could you elaborate on what you mean by "mono-covenantal" and why you say such is the position of the 3FU?
Yes, sorry Danny, I guess it was a bit of an ambiguous statement with the terminology chosen.

My point was simply that the WCF explicitly teaches the covenant of works (hence 2 covenants taught), whereas the 3FU doesn't (only one covenant taught). I wasn't trying to say that the 3FU isn't compatible with a covenant of works.

However, I do know people who can't affirm the WCF because of it's teaching about the covenant of works, but can affirm the 3FU.

Blessings bro.
__________________
Marty

From Creation to New Creation via Redemption
Reply With Quote