View Single Post
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 05-15-2008, 04:58 AM
JohnOwen007's Avatar
JohnOwen007 JohnOwen007 is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth, Australia.
Posts: 635
Thanks: 80
Thanked 217 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADKing View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by KenPierce View Post
As far as not ordaining non-six-dayers. Were Warfield, MAchen, Hodge, and Augustine faithful ministers in the invisible church? What gives us the right to deny them ordination if they were to appear before our courts today?
The fact that godly men have held wrong opinions should not mean that the church should be required to continue tolerating these wrong opinions as greater light is obtained. This line of reasoning would make it difficult to exclude errors from the past simply because godly men have held them (like episcopacy, for one).
Dear Ken,

Your observation is indeed correct that we should not tolerate past errors when greater light has been obtained. However, not all errors are of equal weight; some errors are way more serious than others.

Warfield, Machen, and Hodge are not just any godly men, these guys are giants in the reformed tradition. Hence, we need very good reasons to exclude their position so easily, especially when you haven't expressed what "greater light" has been revealed since their time that makes the issue so clear.

God bless you.
__________________
Marty

"There is nothing so necessary to draw us to repentance as good thoughts of God." (Thomas Manton)
Reply With Quote