View Single Post
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2008, 09:48 PM
raekwon's Avatar
raekwon raekwon is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 609
Thanks: 97
Thanked 199 Times in 107 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw View Post
There is no hard and fast rule on which points are essential to the system of doctrine and which ones are not.

But we do have precedents in different presbyteries and different sessions.

We had a precedent in the LA presbytery of January 2007 saying FV views were not out of accord with the PCA constitution. Several brought charges against that, and the opposite view prevailed, as of the Feb. 9, 2008, LA Presbytery meeting.

When I was ordained a PCA elder in 1978, I had no exceptions, and when I was installed again in a different PCA church in 2007, I had none; but with a keener understanding from reading the debates on PB, perhaps I should amend my views and let my session know, and let them decide whether any exceptions are essential.

Better yet, state your views let them decide whether or not they're "exceptions" in the first place (as opposed to mere "scruples" or nuanced views).
__________________
Rae W. | Elder @ Grace Central Presbyterian Church | Columbus, OH
not another blog, v2.0


Reply With Quote