View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 10:48 PM
toddpedlar's Avatar
toddpedlar toddpedlar is offline.
PB Evil Scientist...Boo!
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 3,324
Thanks: 99
Thanked 788 Times in 463 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archlute View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by danmpem View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformingstudent View Post

My PC has 1.0 GB Memory and 200GB Hard Drive and a 3500 AMD Athlon 64
processor. I am not computer savvy so I don't know if that's good or not. When I bought it two years ago I thought I had enough but now I'm not so sure. It's a lot better then what I used to have though. My last PC ran Windows ME and was real slow and Kept crashing all the time. made me wish I never had bought or looked at a PC.
If you can get to 2 GB RAM, then it will be just great for Vista. You know, I used Windows ME once.

Once.
'Tis true. The reason being that the Vista OS takes up 80% of your 1 Gig just for itself, leaving you with a measly 200 MB. Everything that I had read stated that 2 Gigs was the satisfactory minimum.
And you really ought to just get 3 Gig for the best performance. You can use most of 4 (3.4 to be exact, if memory serves, but because of the limitations of a 32-bit system you can't practically use all 4 Gb). Bill's 6pack is truly overkill ('cause unless he's hotwired something, or if he's using Vista-64, he can't access more than about 3.4Gb).
__________________
Todd K. Pedlar
member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
http://semperubi.rtrc.net

"Many men, after a long conversion, see more of the workings of sin in their hearts than ever they did before or at their first conversion. Now, such men have not an increase of sin, but an increase of illumination and light" (Christopher Love)


Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?