View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 02:28 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
NaphtaliPress NaphtaliPress is offline.
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,047
Blog Entries: 19
Thanks: 898
Thanked 846 Times in 533 Posts
Seems even when one announces in public their changes of mind some folks always seem to miss the retraction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayflower View Post
Oooooo, nooooo!!!!!
My name is 2e page, were he qoute me with the words:

".....this book hath been a great help for me. I hope that many more people will read this book" - Ralph Wilms
The Netherlands

I wrote that in that time when i though that infant sprinkling was Biblical, but sinds a few years i came back to the conclusion of exclusive credo-baptism!!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonathanHunt View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayflower View Post
Oooooo, nooooo!!!!!
My name is 2e page, were he qoute me with the words:

".....this book hath been a great help for me. I hope that many more people will read this book" - Ralph Wilms
The Netherlands

I wrote that in that time when i though that infant sprinkling was Biblical, but sinds a few years i came back to the conclusion of exclusive credo-baptism!!!!!



That is REALLY funny Ralph!!
__________________
Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member
• Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
• The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
• The Blue Banner Archive

The Regulative Principle: Samuel Miller gives a succinct statement of this principle when he writes that since the Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference.”

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum