View Single Post
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 12:22 PM
HaigLaw's Avatar
HaigLaw HaigLaw is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 753
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 165
Thanked 132 Times in 88 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie View Post
Does forgiving one's partner and returning to the marital state necessarily involve the obligation to resume a sexual relationship as per the command not to deprive one's partner sexually? What if the partner fornicated and acquired the HIV infection, in which case resuming the sexual relationship would be suicidal? An HIV positive partner presumably could be selfish enough to insist on not being deprived, in spite of the consequences to his/her partner and offspring. Actually, this is not merely a modern problem because the same situation would have prevailed in Paul's day, the pre-antibiotic era, as regards syphilis--not quite as deadly as AIDS but still a nasty disease.
I think our hermeneutics for discerning these exceptions needs to contemplate these kinds of real-life situations.

It's all fine and good to say -- God hates divorce and so should we, therefore we do things not fine or good when we make rules tighter than God's and leave people in their misery.
__________________

HaigLaw, ruling elder
Grace PCA, Shreveport, LA
http://www.xanga.com/HaigLaw