View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 10:20 AM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
NaphtaliPress NaphtaliPress is offline.
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,067
Blog Entries: 18
Thanks: 725
Thanked 615 Times in 372 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADKing View Post
It depends on what you are after: sermons? theology? polemics? an overview of the distinctives?

A very helpful volume, if you can get it these days is "The Dictonary of Scottish Church History and Theology" edited by David Wright, David Lachman and Donald Meek. It is not something you read through but it is invaluable for understanding the tradition (and its offshoots)
Very true. Use the DSCH&T in conjunction with reputable introductory or survey studies of the Scottish theologians.

The following come to mind which are either broader or more narrow in focus:

John MacPherson, The doctrine of the Church in Scottish theology (Chalmers lectures). Edinburgh: Macniven & Wallace, 1903.

James Walker, The Theology And Theologians Of Scotland (Edinburgh, T. & T. Clark, 1888; Rpt. Edinburgh : Knox Press, 1982).

Other works that have built on the "fathers" such as Bannerman's Church of Christ (rpt. Banner of Truth Trust, 1960) are also good works to discover and jump into the original works referenced. Or you can use works on particular men in the same way such as John Coffey's Politics, Religion and the British Revolutions The Mind of Samuel Rutherford. Cambridge studies in early modern British history (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1997) and W. D. J. McKay's An Ecclesiastical Republic: Church Government in the Writings of George Gillespie (Carlisle, Cumbria, U.K.: Published for Rutherford House by Paternoster Press, 1997).
__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member
Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice
The Blue Banner Archive

When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the ‘old dead orthodoxy,’ and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they ‘differ from it only in words.’ This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Reply With Quote