View Single Post
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 05:19 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 4,748
Thanks: 1,730
Thanked 404 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodas_Prodigy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV1611 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodas_Prodigy View Post
So, you assume that a layman cannot have the gift to preach?
If he has a gift then he should seek ordination and become a presbyter.
OK. I'll go along with that.

My view is that not everyone is called in to full time ministry. Perhaps I am being tripped up on terminology. I know of many men who are Lay-Preachers. Admittedly, most are not Reformed...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodas_Prodigy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodas_Prodigy View Post

So, you assume that a layman cannot have the gift to preach?
Yes, and he's perfectly right to do so. If he had the gift to preach, he'd be a preacher, wouldn't he?
How about a Lay-Preacher? These guys have jobs and don't do full time ministry for whatever reason.
I think you both need to define what you mean by 'lay preacher'. If the definition of a 'lay preacher' is that they are not called to 'full-time ministry' then I am a 'lay preacher' because I am not a full-time pastor. Or does 'lay preacher' mean someone who is asked by a church to preach but has not been formally ordained? If so, then the fact that a church has asked the man to preach is kind of an informal 'ordination' if only for a limited time. This man is still under the 'covering' of a church so to speak.