05-08-2008, 04:54 PM
|
| Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins  Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by greenbaggins It is a mixed bag. On the one hand, you've got John Muether and Charles Hill, both as solid as they come. On the other hand, you've got Waltke, Frame, and Kidd, who are anything but confessionally Reformed. Nicole is good, but emeritus, as is Kistemaker. Futato is a lot like Meredith Kline (taught with Kline at WSC for a while), with Kline's good points and not-so-good points. Overall, as a seminary, I cannot recommend it. RTS Jackson is much much more solid, as is Charlotte. | You cannot recommend Frame as a professor? Is it because of his views on the RPW? | It is because of many, many things. The RPW is one, his views on the confessions are another, his allowance of FV theology and NPP theology is another (he is probably not one himself, but he doesn't think that Shepherd is a problem), his multi-perspectivalism leaves much to be desired. | In one of the endnotes in Salvation Belongs to the Lord (which is an excellent book on the whole), Dr. Frame says that Norman Shepherd's views on justification are within the Reformed tradition - even though he claims to disagree with them.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
|