| Clarification Requested from Traditional Text Supporters
I've bowed out of the textual criticism discussion on the Puritanboard for some time because since entering into the full-time pastorate I just don't have the time to answer the 3+ page replies I get from my typical 2-3 paragraph statements (come on guys, this is a forum).
I've asked these questions before and didn't get a straight answer but I would like to get clarity on where my brethren here on the Puritanboard are at who defend the TT over the CT. I am seeking simple 'yes' or 'no' answers to the following questions...
1. Do you believe any particular version of the Textus Receptus is absolutely identical with the original autographs?
2. Do you believe the Majority Text, is absolutely identical with the original autographs?
3. Do you believe there are any places in the underlying textual choices in the KJV that are flat out wrong?
4. Do you believe that there are any places in the KJV where the translation is flat out wrong?
Please again, if you wish to participate, please only provide a 'yes' or 'no' answer. A clear, simple answer to these questions would greatly help me understand where some of you guys are coming from.
|