Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum  We have too many people who say, ‘I support the church with my money, and I’m there on Sunday. What more do you want of me?’ |
Yep, that sounds pretty much like what I'd say if asked why I'm not involved in my own "ministry."
...though I might say it more like this: "I love being there on Sunday, fellowshipping with God's people, attending to the preaching of the Word and hiding it away in my heart, and receiving the Lord's Supper for my edification. I love praying together. I love the study of the WCF that we do once a month in the evening. I carry these things into the world with me during the week so that I can be a strong witness to my colleagues, friends, and family. Why must you so deceitfully describe with a statement such as "I support my chuch with my money, and I'm there on Sunday. What more do you want of me?" making me sound so trivial and impious?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pergie's quote The answer of course is, ‘We want a great deal more of you! Have you awakened to the fact that you are in ministry? Are you trying to take responsibility to help someone else move forward spiritually?’ .... everyone has a spiritual ministry to and responsibility for other people.”"[/i] |
Well, it's unfortunate that, in J.I. Packer's opinion, the Church wants a great deal more of me, because so does my secular calling that God has appointed me to do to the best of ability, and so does my apartment, which didn't come with an automatic upkeep system, and so do my two jobs, and so will my family in about 3 weeks. Work six days; rest one day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yodas_Prodigy
I guess that I am a little shocked at some of the responses in this thread. Every person who is a believer should be involved in some form of ministry whether it is evangelism, missionary work, apologetics, children's church, Gideons, Wycliff, small groups, etc etc etc.
I do wonder if our pews are just full of unbelievers hoping to get in by going to church and being good people? Or, do we have a bunch of spiritual babes who are fat and sassy?
|
Or perhaps we have a bunch of pharisees who would put unscriptural burdens on other believers in order to enforce some false notion of piety and duty. How about lazy ministers? O, the possibilities!
As you have been wont to demand in other threads, where is your scriptural support for the assertion that "every believer should be involved in some for of ministry"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra_Mundum The logic of "everybody's a minister" is ... that there will be no "Minister."
Of course, we want everyone to have an opportunity for various forms of "involvement" in the communal life of the church. But what about THE Ministry? Is it a reality? If it is, then the "pew sitters" (as they have been termed) actually have a right to expect their Minister to give 100% to his task. And their elders to give 100% to theirs. And the deacons too.
But I don't recall the Word of God listing the job descriptions of anyone else. So, the creation of various "ministries" in the church is ... just man-made positions. Holding people accountable for spiritual negligence, when God hasn't, is a species of Phariseeism.
As was already pointed out, there is a doctrine of callings (or vocations). Some are called to the ministry. Everyone else is called to "work with their own hands," so that they might have something to give to others in need. Putting someone on guilt-trip for not "contributing" at church, instead of praying and waiting for the Spirit of God to move hearts to expand the church's reach, is the wrong tactic. Trying to turn the church into an activity center is foolish.
The people are supposed to come to the SERVICE. Whose service are we talking about? GOD'S. Yes, that's right, as a matter of fact, it IS all about coming to church and get get get get get. Receive Receive Receive Receive Receive. That is EXACTLY what salvation is all about. It is the job of THE Ministry to GIVE to the people in the pews, on behalf of God.
That the people respond dialogically (by speaking back to God) is perfectly reasonable. But that is the WORSHIP aspect of the "worship/service." Perhaps we would be better instructed by calling it a Service/worship. |
There are so many good points here that I'm not even going to attempt to italicize or bold them all.
I, as a layperson responsible for his studies, jobs, home, and soon-to-be-family am sick and tired of this kind of talk. I thought I was done with this when I left the charismatic church. During the Reformation we did away with this halfway monasticism and allowed those who aren't called to work in the Church feel like we're still doing something important to God. It is obvious that the laity is to have fellowship with believers, speak words of kindness, pray with and for others, etc., but that is NOT THE SAME THING as having an actual position or "ministry" within the Church. If you want more ministries in your church, elect more elders and deacons who have the time, skills, and desire to minister in such capacities. Stop guilt-tripping the rest of us.
It concerns me that the propagation of unconfessional ideas has been disciplined and stifled so vigorously in other forums on this board, but when believers try to unconfessionally yoke other believers on matters of music, alcohol, literature, and this sort of thing, we have to tolerate it. Why should this discussion even be necessary here among Reformed Christians? Why is Yoda allowed to question the salvation of believers who don't have their own special corner of ministry in the Church? Go read Luther. Go listen to the White Horse Inn.