Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcFadden  Tim,
But, one of the most infuriating aspects of his theology is the way he gives with one hand and takes with the other. Against liberals, he affirmed the incarnation and resurrection of Christ. But, when Carl Henry asked him what one would see if they were an eye-witness on Resurrection morning, he asked Henry if he said he was representing Chrisitanity Today or Christianity Yesterday?
Plus, not many theologians write 9,000 page ST.
He certainly considered himself Reformed. However, he would never have been accepted on PB. |
That's good. His followers have been a thorn in my side in the PCUSA. I've studied the good and great theologians. I've been wondering why people don't stick with the greats instead of going for what's trendy or modern? The classical theological categories seem far better than redefining them. The Christianity Today or Christianity Yesterday is hilarious! For He's the same, Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow!