Thread: Ham's Sin
View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-02-2008, 08:17 PM
A5pointer's Avatar
A5pointer A5pointer is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marmora NJ
Posts: 538
Thanks: 35
Thanked 46 Times in 35 Posts
Are we imposing our sensibility on the text? The Leviticus passage should be enough for us. We all accept scripture interprets scripture. It should be as shocking to us that a people is cursed for the sin of looking on a drunk father naked. It just does not make sense. Yes it says Noah fell asleep naked but this is no less a part of the euphemism as is the act and the description of the act and of the brothers not participating in the same act. We as moderns are well aware of euphemisms used to describe sexual acts. It may well be that biblical writers used them as we would, to be less vulgar and or to shield the graphic description from the youth. The later makes sense as the books of Moses would have been read to the masses. I understand the suggested interpretations but think they are based(not intentionally) on predetermined thoughts rather than bare acknowledgement of the text.
__________________
Bruce
PCUSA
Ocean City NJ
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to A5pointer For This Useful Post:
kalawine (05-03-2008)