View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2008, 05:31 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 5,177
Thanks: 1,992
Thanked 460 Times in 272 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim Standard View Post
"all mankind" does not mean every man woman and child past, present, & future.

If it said 'every man' I would have a bone to pick. Mankind is far from every man.
Once again, I am a 5 pointer but the 'all' that Ursinius is talking about is clearly 'every man' for he is answering the objections of the universalist:

Quote:
If Christ made satisfaction for all, then all ought to be saved. But all are not saved. Therefore, he did not make a perfect satisfaction.

Ans. Christ satisfied for all, as it respects the sufficiency of the satisfaction which he made, but not as it respects the application thereof
The Following User Says Thank You to KMK For This Useful Post:
Amazing Grace (04-30-2008)