View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 09:42 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Backwoods Presbyterian Backwoods Presbyterian is offline.
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 6,193
Thanks: 2,297
Thanked 929 Times in 646 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
I have a question regarding overseers.

1 Timothy 3:4 reads.

My questions is: If a married man does not have children would this disqualify him from the office?

I would say no. This does not disqualify him from the office as long as his duties as a husband are in order and the other qualifications are met. My understanding of the text is this: If he does have children they should be submissive and orderly. However, it doesn't seem that its a prerequisite for a overseer to have children.

What think ye?
Think about that for a minute. If a marriage and children were necessary, then Paul could not be an elder.

Neither could Christ.
Think?

Fred, Fred,

You should be asking how I feel about it.
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser
Pittsburgh, PA,
Fairmount ARP Church
Candidate Under Care Pittsburgh Theological Seminary & Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary
"The benefit of deliverance becomes the more precious in the same proportion in which we are brought to apprehend the magnitude of the evil from which we have been rescued"
-- Zacharias Ursinus, Commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism