
04-25-2008, 10:24 PM
|
 | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,951
Thanks: 1,393
Thanked 764 Times in 548 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum A few questions and comments:
Is John Owen reformed? Wasn't we a congregationalist?
Who has the right to give us a sliding scale of who is more reformed than others?
Isn't it a prerogative of every group to define themselves as they wish. Presbies may sniffle and moan but if baptists want the category "reformed" in front of their names to identify themselves with the 1689 confession, then the reformed cannot stop them and should stop their whining.
Last time I checked there was no little copyright symbol above the name reformed.
Finally, given the company of those that call themselves "reformed" to include many groups that are grossly deviant in doctrine (whole groups falling away into apostasy), being a baptist who calls himself reformed or calvinisitic puts me in a lot better company.
P.S. Particular Baptist is a brand that is currently being used by many who trace their lineage from the anabaptist tradition. Therefore, this label, too, does not fit, for those that desire a modified WCF and are happy with the 1689. The term Sovereign grace baptist also is sometimes associated with more of a Fundyist and anti-confessional stance and so is not an adequate label. I prefer to simply call myself calvinistic and baptistic. | I have heard others use the term "Historic Baptist" but that can be problematic as well because some will associate it with Landmarkism.
__________________
Chris
Member at Grace Community Baptist Church, Mandeville, LA
Beware of a religion without holdfasts. But if I get a grip upon a doctrine they call me a bigot. Let them do so. Bigotry is a hateful thing, and yet that which is now abused as bigotry is a great virtue, and greatly needed in these frivolous times. I have been inclined lately to start a new denomination, and call it "the Church of the Bigoted." Spurgeon
|