Malthusian. Now there's a word I haven't read in a while, but most appropriate to this discussion.

I don't know that I've ever heard that a reason for rejecting Darwinism is that it leads to eugenics. Only that the practice of eugenics in humans was a logical extension of the godless, ammoral paradigm that Darwinism requires. The fallacy lies in that those who most vehemently support Darwinism generally reject human eugenics just as vehemently, regardless of the logical incoherence of their position.

__________________
Brad
PCA Member
Virginia

Pro 16:33 The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.

Isa 8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.