Quote:
Originally Posted by HaigLaw  Quote:
Originally Posted by toddpedlar Would you mind sharing the synopsis of your disagreement with this action? | Sure! I was in agreement. I voted for it. I think the vote was, like, 7 or 8 to 2.
We spent about 4 hours debating it. Concerns included removing all typo's and outdated information.
Other concerns were to put FV behind us, if possible, and take a public position reversing the LaP's former (Jan. 2007) position that had essentially vindicated Rev. Wilkins as being in accord with the PCA's Constitution.
As has been the case in prior meetings of LaP I have summarized on my Xanga blog, there were varying levels of understanding of the implications of FV theology.  |
That is quite a turnaround! Thanks for the update and your work in the LaP, brother.
Knowing something of the history of the LaP over the past decade or so, "more ministry related matters" are certainly what needs to be focused on now that the presbytery seems to have largely been delivered from the FV and other related controversies that have caused the presbytery to lose churches and members over that span.