Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe  Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK According to Gentry, Chilton never became a hyperpreterist. He says the hyperpreterists made the whole thing up. | There is probably some truth to that. |
I understand that his last book "What Happened in 70 AD?", is hyper, but have never read it.
Gary North seems to agree, from
Gary North vs. David Chilton Quote:
As the publisher of Days of Vengeance and Paradise Restored, let me say, without hesitation, that the post-1994 David Chilton is indeed a heretic who has denied the Church's historic creeds and confessions on the question of the Second Coming of Christ and the Final Judgment.
It is always sad when a defender of the faith abandons orthodoxy on any point. When he abandons it on the very point on which he had made his intellectual reputation, it is double sad. In Chilton's case, it is pathetic, for no matter what he writes on this topic from now on, his critics will be able to say, justifiably: "His heart attack disrupted his ability to think clearly. It distorted his judgment."
|