View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 04:13 PM
ADKing ADKing is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 970
Thanks: 148
Thanked 634 Times in 266 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poimen View Post
From the article:

Quote:
The King James Version, although it is almost 400 years old, is still the best translation available today.
Although this was probably not the intent of the original author it is rather revealing that the best translation of the Bible is in English, and not in Dutch, Chinese etc.

I wonder if other language groups make translations of the Bible in an older, antiquated version of their current tongue? Perhaps we should be looking at our cultural preferences, not making assumptions about the superiority of our translations.
I think you are correct is saying that this was not the author's original intent. He probably would agree that the best translation of the Bible in English is the AV (rather than saying the best translation is in English). It is my understanding that the Old Dutch Bible and the Old French (Louis Segond) are TR based and still endorsed by TR advocates although they obviously use older Dutch and French vocabulary and style. Someone feel free to correct me if I am mistaken here.
__________________
Rev. Adam King
Minister in the RPCNA
Pastor,Trinity Reformed Church
Wichita, KS