04-11-2008, 12:17 PM
|
 | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,429
Thanks: 1,189
Thanked 1,267 Times in 671 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by JOwen  Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua Quote:
Originally Posted by JOwen 
Think again brother!
Gal 4:19 My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you,
Eph 1:5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, 
Blessings! | So, what if one is unable to physically have children, and is not called/qualified to raise spiritual children? Does that mean such a one is not a man, albeit due to Providential hindrances?  | Errr, this is not going the right direction. My post was simple fun, nothing more intended. Of course a man's masculinity is not tied to the number of children he has. |  That's what I originally thought (hence my "tongue-in-cheek" qualifying question)! Sorry, Sir.  |