The implication of #2 is that natural law may not be used as a common ground ethic between Christians and unbelievers. The implication of #3 is that it may so be used. That's how I intended to form the poll, sorry if that was unclear. Should I have worded it differently?

__________________
Casey Bessette
Westminster OPC • West Suburbs of Chicago • My Blog: Paradise Regained

"It is part of the calling of the ekklesia to learn to know the love of Christ that surpasses all knowledge and also to make known within the world of science 'the manifold wisdom of God' in order that the final end of theology, as of all things, may be that the name of the Lord is glorified. Theology and dogmatics, too, exist for the Lord's sake." — Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics, vol. 1, p. 46