View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:48 PM
ModernPuritan?'s Avatar
ModernPuritan? ModernPuritan? is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Montgomery, ALabama
Posts: 371
Thanks: 70
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gage Browning View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
(particularly concerning their quip about music)

In my opinion, a return to singing Psalms, with the exclusion of instruments is the only way to snuff out the idea of musical instrument, hymns or praise songs, preferences that pervade the Churches today.

I just don't see how one who embraces musical instruments and non-canonical hymns in the stated worship of the Church has the grounds upon which to reject the inclusion of "praise choruses," guitars, drums, ________ (fill in the blank) also.

But I am ooohhhh so teachable.
You make a good argument on guitars and drums etc...
My question is how do you only sing Psalms which never actually name the name of Christ? I know they point to him in type and shadow, I know the Psalms was God's songbook, but to disallow other songs, hymns or spiritual songs that actually name the name of Christ seems strange to me. Thoughts?
Since Father, Son, Holy spirit= the God Head, Id contend that any attribute or reference to God in Psalms is appropriate and not simply a "foreshadow" various references to God being the Rock of my salvation and so forth.... Its just as true today, as it was 3,000 years ago no?

Just so many churches are blind..

"You allow a talented singer, to sing a solo;
a talented actor to act a part .
Soon the house of God
will be; the house of art."
- MP
__________________
Jeff Rod
Eastwood Presbyterian Church PCA
member.
webpage: myspace.com/reformationforever

To live a simple, peaceable life before God
To owe as little as possible, to few as possible.
The Following User Says Thank You to ModernPuritan? For This Useful Post:
Davidius (04-02-2008)