View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 11:52 AM
Simply_Nikki's Avatar
Simply_Nikki Simply_Nikki is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,125
Thanks: 427
Thanked 149 Times in 92 Posts
I was kidding hence the smirk.

On a serious note, I'm not sure, though I think I could probably submit to a paedo husband's stance on that issue. However, what if the children once adults wanted to be baptized again because they did not come to accept the position of paedo baptism? I've seen many adults do this, especially those who left the church and came back. Oh and why would it be blasphemy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
As a credo, I have no problem courting or marrying a paedo....

The children will probably just have to be baptized twice
But to the paedo husband, and the Reformed Paedos everywhere, that would be considered as blasphemous and a denial of their children's baptism (i.e. the original).
__________________
Nikki Edmond
Berean Christian Assembly (Reformed Baptist)
Tucson, AZ
HaveATulip Chat Room for Reformed Believers
Principle and Practice Blog
Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction.
Reply With Quote