03-29-2008, 09:18 AM
|
| Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV1611  Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie Actually, all joking aside, I am not "happy" to deny that point, I have wrestled with it for years, but am not presently convinced I could swear to that in good conscience. Therefore, for the sake of integrity, I must take an exception. | Their interpretation of Revelation was necessarily coloured by their culture and historic circumstances.
My point was fairly obvious and I am sure you got the point; you are welcome to charge me as being unconfessional, but if you do so, make sure you agree jot and tittle with it yourself. That you don't, renders your whole point somewhat moot. | Not necessarily; I have no problem with someone admitting that they do not agree with the WCF when they genuinely don't. However, this needs to be made clear.
I agree with what you say about the Puritan interpretation of Revelation.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
|