Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon  Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe Quote:
Originally Posted by AV1611
I don't think that anyone is denying an obvious chronology from day 1 to day 7, the issue is the import of this.
| If you posit an obvious 1-7 chronology, and that the days are sequential (which is what the waw signifies, then you are necessarily a YECer. Welcome to the camp.
I am surprised the moderators and TRs haven't come in to defend the Confession. | Sorry to have to disagree on this yet again, but subscribing to a 1-7 chronology does NOT necessarily make one a YE creationist. That the events of Day 1 happened before Day 2, which happened before Day 3, etc. does not imply a calendar day.
I agree that the writers of the Confession believed in 24 hr days, but the wording is still broad: "in the space of six days." This of course resolves nothing, because one of the key issues is what exactly constitutes a day in this account.
As an aside, here is an interesting excerpt from Calvin:
"...it is certain, from the context, that the light was so created as to be interchanged with darkness. But it may be asked, whether light and darkness succeeded each other in turn through the whole circuit of the world; or whether the darkness occupied one half of the circle, while light shone in the other. There is, however, no doubt that the order of their succession was alternate, but whether it was everywhere day at the same time, and everywhere night also, I would rather leave undecided; nor is it very necessary to be known." |
I think I see: are you defining day in 24 hour terms?
If so, then if you posit a chronology, equaling a 144 hour week, then you cannot escape YEC. Because if days 1-7 follow each other, then I don't see how you can avoid the conclusion.
If day can mean anything at this point, well anything goes (including a consistent hermeneutics).