Quote:
Originally Posted by AV1611  Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanhoe History implies chronology. Thus the use of the waw (I have yet to see anyone deal with this). Why is the use of the waw in the rest of Genesis historic but the use of the waw in 1-2 (where it is more predominantly used than anywhere else in the Bible), not historic? | May be you would like to set forth your argument using the waw with supportive texts. I take it you are simply refering to the repetition of "and". |
Simple. Read every "and" in the Old Testament. With the exception of a few Psalms, written in obvious poetic form, every and implies temporal, narrative chronology.
Now, as to textual support. I will not copy paste every Hebrew verse that has "and" in it!
