03-26-2008, 07:39 PM
|
 | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 1,468
Thanks: 237
Thanked 181 Times in 150 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen  Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK Quote:
Originally Posted by Civbert It depends on the context. But in the context of systematic theology (e.g. the WCF, or in explanation of our relationship to Christ), I would define salvation in simple terms like Webster's 1828: "the redemption of man from the bondage of sin and liability to eternal death, and the conferring on him everlasting happiness". In a more generic context, salvation means simply "the act of saving; preservation from destruction, danger or great calamity" (Webster 1812, first definition). | Quote:
Originally Posted by Poimen When God saves us, we are rescued from the condemnation and power of sin. Salvation encompasses justification and sanctification as acts of God in the life of the elect otherwise Philippians 2:12 doesn't make any sense. We are not saved by works but we are saved unto works.
Canons of Dordrecht, 1.9
| Perhaps we could say that salvation, since it includes justification and redemption, makes sanctification possible but does not include sanctification in a 'progressive' sense but only in a 'positional' sense. | The way you have stated your position would not be in conformity with Scripture or the Westminster Standards. Sanctification is always an ongoing and progressive work in the believer's life. Justification has to do with our standing or position. If one is not progressing in holiness, he is not a believer. Justification always results in sanctification. |
It is both positional and progressive. As I pointed out your error in the other thread so graciously, both flow form the fountain of Grace.. 
__________________
N. Robert; Trinity Reformed Church RCA, Holland MI
Once in a while you can get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right."
|