Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter  Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Bombadil Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter
Yes you are and No you don't. I won that one.  And I am not sure I agree with Jewett anyways. You are assuming again. | I did't think you agreed with Jewett. So, what am I "assuming" and how is it "again." You're overreaching, again.
Jewett = the paedobaptist destroyer only when baptists agree with him.
I just enjoy using baptists against other baptists. I have tons of quotes from baptists, almost to the point that I coud play one baptist off another and hardly ever have to resort to using a paedobaptist rejoinder to one of their arguments.
At the end of the day, though, I thought Jewett's point was sound. Very. | And I can use Paedo's against paedo's. No big deal. |
Good.
a) Many baptists have tried to give the impression that only the paedo camp is divided. Glad we realize the baptists who have made much of this (cf. Malone, Baptism of Disciples Alone) are not being square with the facts.
b) I haven't seen you use any against ay of *my* arguments.
c) Right now we're dealing with Jewett's rather devasting point against *your* interpretation of the verses Green Baggins point out.