03-25-2008, 06:20 PM
|
 | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 7,488
Thanks: 804
Thanked 739 Times in 465 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Bombadil  Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Bombadil
No, we're not. I thought Jewtt's point was rather clear. At any rate, to disagree with it is to disagree with Jewett. I score points either way!  | Yes you are and No you don't. I won that one.  And I am not sure I agree with Jewett anyways. You are assuming again. | I did't think you agreed with Jewett. So, what am I "assuming" and how is it "again." You're overreaching, again.
Jewett = the paedobaptist destroyer only when baptists agree with him.
I just enjoy using baptists against other baptists. I have tons of quotes from baptists, almost to the point that I coud play one baptist off another and hardly ever have to resort to using a paedobaptist rejoinder to one of their arguments.
At the end of the day, though, I thought Jewett's point was sound. Very. | And I can use Paedo's against paedo's. No big deal.
|