View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 04:37 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
NaphtaliPress NaphtaliPress is offline.
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,008
Blog Entries: 19
Thanks: 885
Thanked 841 Times in 530 Posts
Thanks for all the replies. Now for the possible monkey wrench. The first reading without the additional "all" is the reading of the both Larger Catechism Manuscripts and the Minutes of the Assembly. The second reading is that of the first printed edition which passed on to all subsequent printed texts. It is "possible" the addition, while it may clarify (and some of you do not think it is necessarily a needed clarification) could have been a printer's slip that got by everyone rather than an intentional emendation by the Assembly to make a clarification.

So, what do you think now?
__________________
Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member
• Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
• The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
• The Blue Banner Archive

The Regulative Principle: Samuel Miller gives a succinct statement of this principle when he writes that since the Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference.”

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum