View Single Post
  #126 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 10:06 PM
py3ak's Avatar
py3ak py3ak is offline.
El Tirano
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,697
Thanks: 123
Thanked 744 Times in 481 Posts
I don't really want to get deeply involved in this thread, but I do want to make two textual notes. If Rebekah covers herself when she sees Isaac, then obviously before that time she was not covered; which means that around the servants in the camel caravan she felt quite free to let her hair, etc., be seen. So patently it was not part of patriarchal culture that all women must at all times have their hair thoroughly covered.

Second, if the priest is to uncover the head of the woman suspected of adultery, we must conclude that the priest is meant to be immune to the enticing power of her hair. Now this could be because priests (like hairdressers?) were endowed with a remarkable constancy in the face of the overwhelming allurement of dead keratin, or because it could be reasonably supposed that any man not in the grip of an overmastering lust would be able to limit a sexual response to hair to that found on the top of his wife's scalp.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to py3ak For This Useful Post:
Kevin (03-23-2008), Pergamum (03-23-2008), Semper Fidelis (03-23-2008), Simply_Nikki (03-23-2008), Southern Presbyterian (03-24-2008), SRoper (03-24-2008)