View Single Post
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2008, 05:45 PM
danmpem's Avatar
danmpem danmpem is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 1,399
Blog Entries: 4
Thanks: 342
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV1611 View Post
Thanks for the responses thus far. Is it possible to determine whether they held to an ex opere operato view of baptismal efficacy, i.e. disounting "worthy reception" (by/through faith)? From my reading of St. Augustine he would hold that baptism takes away original sin. That poses the question in my mind, is Augustine saying that the water does that or that the Spirit of God does that through the water.

Are we able to determine what the ECF meant by "regeneration". Calvin understood it to be lifelong if I am not mistaken.

My biggest problem with saying tha baptism regenerates is the even if it were true then that must mean circumcision regenerated in the OT but then what did before Genesis 17?

Random thoughts, I know, but I need to get back to my essay.
I'm no ECF scholar, but didn't Augustine's view of baptism change over the time of his life?
__________________
Dan Pemberton
Vacaville, CA

Member, First Baptist Church San Luis Obispo
Formerly ABUSA (We left, so I guess that makes us American Baptists Unleashed!)