View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2008, 10:04 PM
Sonoftheday's Avatar
Sonoftheday Sonoftheday is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Foyil, Oklahoma
Posts: 475
Thanks: 95
Thanked 84 Times in 54 Posts
This is funny.

There was a post on another site I talk/type on and it basically said; "Is it ok for a new covenant believer to paint a picture of Jesus, yes the second commandment can be used to say no, but the Law is no longer binding. Does the New testament ban painting a picture of Jesus?" The replies other than mine and one other guys was its perfectly ok to paint a picture of Jesus. Most said it is just legalism and phariseeism that says not to paint Jesus.

Because of that post I posted today this;
Quote:
I have been told that beastiality is wrong but have found no New Testament evidence saying it is. There are statements about sexual immorallity being sin, but that is a very broad phrase that you have to interperet to mean beastility is wrong. The New Testament clearly states that Homosexuality is wrong, Adultery is wrong, and even lust is wrong, but it does not mention beastiality to my knowledge. The only place I have found in the bible that says beastiality is wrong is in the Law but it is void/annulled and so it doesnt matter. Is it ok then for a believing New Covenant member to practice beastiality?
The reply I get is, Common you have to be joking, and is this supposed to be a serious question.

It amazes me that both of these questions are the exact same question only concerning different sins, and the typical christian answers are complete opposites.
__________________
Bryan Riddle
1689 London Baptist Confession
Bethel Baptist Church Owasso, Oklahoma
Reply With Quote