I have always drawn a subtle distinction between semi-Pelagian and Arminian, although both views are very closely related.
Semi-Pelagianism to me says that man is mostly depraved, yet not totally. There is no need for "prevenient" grace, as man is still "good enough" to choose God when He calls. (This is opposed to full Pelagianism, which says man doesn't need grace at all to be saved, he can save himself.)
Arminianism to me says that man is totally depraved, and apart from the working of "prevenient" grace, man cannot, will not choose God in any circumstance.
Thoughts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josiah  Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter I thought Arminius was a semi pelagian. I don't think he was a full blown pelagian. | 
I would have to agree. I wonder though what he would think of such modern groups as the Open theists.
sorry 
Back on topic,  I wonder If the Cumberland's might move more close to historic Christianity? I know that in another split-P group there is a stronger push for a more self-Consciously Reformed Identity. Perhaps the Lord may yet work in their hearts as he has with that other Presbyterian group. |