View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2008, 04:19 PM
satz satz is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,754
Thanks: 108
Thanked 74 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaybird0827 View Post
Why would a compulsory education law be unscriptural (or against natural law, for that matter)?

Why would that be a wicked law?

Anyone?

I see no reason why it would be either unscriptural or wicked.

(Although because of the type of governments we have, the practical application might end up that way)

Someone on another thread used the phrase 'Regulative Principle of Government'. The idea that the government needs a specific allowance from scripture for whatever it does or however it uses its authority almost seems to be assumed in much of the political discussion on the PB, but I see no warrant for taking such a view in the bible.

Laws may be made that are harsh, overbearing and intrusive and the one in authority will answer to God for that, but that does not give the ones under authority the right to declare those laws as illegitimate.

If we are going to treat government authority this way, I see no bible reason to not do the same with the authority of husbands over wives or parents over children. Yet no one I know would say wives of children have the right to ask their husbands/parents to show them specific biblical warrant for each and every single way they exercise their authority.
__________________
Mark Li
International University Church
New South Wales, Australia
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to satz For This Useful Post:
christianyouth (03-10-2008), jaybird0827 (03-08-2008)