In my church we have standardized on the English Standard Version. Apart from the issue regarding whether the Traditional text is better or the Critical text, it is a great translation.
The biggest problem I have with engaging in the textual criticism debate on the PB is that, as far as I can tell from past experience, all those who defend the Traditional Text here begin with the KJV and work backwards to prove from there why the KJVs particular reading is the correct one. If any of our Traditional Text defenders would like to disprove that, please show us one place where you believe the KJV used an incorrect reading from the original manuscripts? Um...do that in another thread however, as I don't mean to hijack this one.
