03-05-2008, 01:11 PM
|
| Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyFlynt  The KJV was a Reaction to the Geneva. If you think it was an Improvement, how? | Not entirely, the dislike of the GB was really to do with its notes as is fairly clear historically. Not least because one of the rules from King James I was 14. These translations to be used, when they agree better with the text than the Bishops’ Bible. TYNDAL’S, COVERDALE’S, MATTHEWS’S, WHITCHURCH’S, GENEVA. http://www.trinitarianbiblesociety.o...cles/kings.pdf
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
|