
03-01-2008, 12:10 AM
|
 | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: NYC
Posts: 4,602
Thanks: 1,367
Thanked 285 Times in 191 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra_Mundum Politics. Power. War. Family. This is my take:
Joab would have pulled the "patriot" defense, and would likely have got away with his deed: 2Sam 3:25 Thou knowest Abner the son of Ner, that he came to deceive thee, and to know thy going out and thy coming in, and to know all that thou doest."
If David sought Joab's conviction and execution, for murder and treason, he could have (from the earthly viewpoint), winning or losing the judgment might have lost the union of the people he had just achieved, chiefly by losing the Judahites. If he acted similar to Saul, and just summarily executed Joab on his own prerogative as supreme dictator, he would have undermined his position morally. As it was, Joab's twisted vengeance nearly cost the unity anyway, and it took a public mourning by David (vv 31, 32, 37) to redress what had been so long in the making and nearly undone.
| this is the thing that bothers me. Even after David mourns, Joab continually served David valiantly especially when it came to the children of Ammon. Joab willingly refused to conquer the city, so that David would get the honor. Couldn't David have found time during his reign to admonish Joab?
__________________
~Keon Garraway~ Brooklyn, NY Member of Franklin Square OPC
Love for God demonstrated by the love for our children in giving them a God centered education is the only hope for our country. by David Morrow
Pslam 71:20 [Thou], which hast shewed me great and sore troubles, shalt quicken me again, and shalt bring me up again from the depths of the earth.
|