Originally Posted by DMcFadden

Aaron,

You were reponding to Daniel. However, you raise some important points. In my post immediatley above your own, I did not engage in ad hominem attacks on anybody. My post also supplied bibliographic suggestions for exploring issues such as plate techtonic rapid subduction, decay in the genome, etc. There was no unchristian attack on anyone. In fact, I shared my own "testimony" of living most of my adult life as a day ager until re-examining the issue a few years ago. Ultimately, however, it is not a matter of one person having "my view" and another having a different one. Certainly, shouldn't we be able to agree that the Scripture rules over our own "views" whatever they might be?

And, ultimately one must determine how the divine author and human author intended Genesis 1-11 to be understood. Literary analysis of the text by the prof at The Master's Seminary is either correct or incorrect. If it is correct, we should all be YEC people. If it is incorrect, please explain to me how and why. Perhaps you will convince me of the superiority of your exegesis.