Quote:
Originally Posted by holyfool33  It depends on what you mean by serious there are some good arguments for Six Day Creation. But sadly the Answers in Genesis crowd seems to want to atack anyone who disagrees with them. I favor the day-age theory o in there thinking I don't support true biblical exegesis i support an idea that down plays the historicity of Adam and makes suffering and death happen before the fall. This just doesn't compute with me because who says it has to be a literal 24 hour day it could very well have taken millions upon millions of years to create the earth but I don't really feel in the long run it is something worth going to war over. |
Yet on other threads you have said that you favour Dispensationalism because it takes a literal approach (to literature which is obviously not literal), yet you favour a non-literal approach to a historical account? Seems a very strange position to hold?
Tell me, why can't the word day mean a literal day in Genesis 1? What is the significance of the phrase the "evening and the morning" if the day age theory is correct?