Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Bosse  Hello Tom B,
The reason I started this thread to explore epistemology without assuming all the intricacies of the current debates in the field. Rather, I was hoping to let the discussion develop these ideas. If someone came up to you and asked you what knowledge is, how would you answer them? My guess is that you would read your audience, and answer accordingly. In this thread I was hoping we would not assume much epistemological sophistication. I was hoping to spark discussion that would develop into more sophisticated ideas. The thread would be kind of like an introduction to epistemology that would start with justified true belief, explore the problems with this, and then explore different solutions. It seems my idea is misplaced and this is not a good thread. 
Brian | I think it's a good thread, and I'd be more interested in discussing if you would be, too.
Paul says in Colossians 2 that all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge are in Christ. Would that be a starting point for defining knowledge? And just so you don't assume that in asking a simple question I'm trying to espouse Clarkianism, please know that I am not doing so. Even if Scripturalism as defined by Clark is wrong (which I know you believe, and of which I am presently not sure), I know of no other place to start than Scripture.
__________________
Davidius
Husband of Emilia
Member: First Reformed Presbyterian Church of Durham (RPCNA) - Durham, NC
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German Literature and Classics
This may explain the old adage about Baptists being Methodists with shoes, and Presbyterians being Baptists who can read. To round out the adage, Lutherans might qualify as Presbyterians who drink to excess, and Episcopalians as Lutherans who know when to say when. - D.G. Hart
|